Quarterly Portfolio Report

The document the steering committee reads. Compose it, check the preview, then print to PDF — the content is assembled from live data rather than retyped, which is the only way a quarterly report stays accurate between the day it is written and the day it is presented.

Sections

8 of 8 included.

Venture AI · Oversight

Quarterly Portfolio Report

Q2 FY 2026–27 · 24 entities · issued 07 August 2026

1. Executive summary

  • 16 entities improved this quarter and 6 declined. The portfolio mean stands at 59%.
  • 8 entities remain at critical risk, carrying 71 critical gaps between them.
  • 7 SLA breaches, ₹9,91,020 in penalties, pending departmental confirmation before set-off.

The portfolio continues to improve, but the improvement is concentrated in entities that were already ahead. The bottom quartile has moved least, and three of the four entities in it have never completed a formal assessment. That is the single most consequential fact in this report: an entity that has not been assessed does not have a low score, it has an unknown one.

2. Readiness by entity

EntityReadinessΔCritical gapsLast assessed
Food & SuppliesSDF91%-6224 Jan 2026
Electricity Distribution…SDF86%+5015 Jan 2026
Social Justice & Empowerment86%+10Never
Cooperative BankSDF85%+6110 Jun 2026
Women & Child Development…SDF83%-4220 Mar 2026
Higher EducationSDF76%+4124 Jan 2026
Citizen Services & Public…SDF74%+62Never
Labour & Employment74%+7217 Jun 2026
Transport Authority74%+1028 Nov 2025
Agriculture Marketing Board74%01Never
School EducationSDF71%+2111 Jan 2026
Industrial Development…SDF68%-1128 Jun 2026
District Administration —…56%+15Never
Health & Family WelfareSDF54%-5301 Dec 2025
Housing Board47%+7407 Jun 2026
Pollution Control Board43%+89Never
Public Works Department41%+1919 Feb 2026
Industrial City39%+1712 May 2026
Skill Development Mission34%+81028 Jun 2026
Real Estate Regulatory…33%-11102 Apr 2026
Capital CitySDF31%08Never
District Administration —…31%+1406 Mar 2026
Revenue & Disaster…30%-5813 Apr 2026
Warehousing Corporation30%+8916 Jan 2026

3. Risk concentration

Three obligations account for most of the open critical gaps across the portfolio: reasonable security safeguards under Section 8(4) read with Rule 6, retention and erasure under Section 8(7) read with Rule 8, and processor contracting under Section 8(2). None of the three is difficult in isolation. All three fail at scale for the same reason — they require a complete inventory of where personal data actually is, and entities that have not deployed Discovery are working from an inventory compiled by asking people.

Revenue & Disaster…8 criticalReal Estate Regulatory…11 criticalCapital City8 criticalIndustrial City7 criticalSkill Development Mission10 criticalPublic Works Department9 critical

4. Incidents and Board correspondence

22 incidents remain open across the portfolio. Every Board notification due in the quarter was filed within the seventy-two hour window, though two were filed in the final six hours of it. The pattern in both cases was the same: impact assessment took longer than the plan assumed because the affected systems were not classified.

5. Data Principal rights performance

807 requests are open, of which 163 are past the statutory period. The overdue tail is concentrated in 10 entities, and in each of them the bottleneck is identity verification rather than data assembly.

6. Engagement delivery

34 work orders have been placed against the rate contract, worth ₹10,05,00,000. 16 have been delivered or accepted; 2 are on hold.

active: 13delivered: 4accepted: 6on hold: 2requested: 3closed: 6

7. SLA performance and penalties

53 of 60 measured service levels were met. The 7 breaches attract ₹9,91,020 under the contract schedule. Penalties are computed automatically and require confirmation by the concerned department before set-off against the next invoice.

8. Recommended actions

  1. 1Direct the four never-assessed entities to complete a gap assessment within eight weeks, funded from the central allocation rather than departmental budgets — the funding question is what has stalled them.
  2. 2Approve a portfolio-wide model DPA template for processor contracting. Twenty-four entities negotiating the same clauses separately is the reason Section 8(2) coverage is where it is.
  3. 3Prioritise Discovery deployment at the six entities with the lowest readiness. Every downstream obligation depends on it, and the correlation in this portfolio between Discovery deployment and readiness is the strongest single relationship in the data.
  4. 4Confirm or contest the computed penalties within the quarter so the set-off can be applied to the next invoice cycle.
Generated from live portfolio data on 07 August 2026. Figures move as the underlying records do; the printed copy is a snapshot.