Monthly Compliance Reports
SL-02The standing report from the DPO to the department head and the oversight portal. Two pages, monthly, whether or not anything happened — a report only produced when there is good news is not a monitoring function.
DischargesS.10
Reports
7
Acknowledged
5
Awaiting submission
1
Readiness trend
+14pts
Over the reported period
Readiness across the reporting period
The number the department head actually tracks between reports.
Reporting periods
Select one to view.
Compliance report — 2026-08
Department of Citizen Services & Public Welfare · prepared by Meera Iyer · 04 Aug 2026
draft
Readiness
Overall
75%
Down 2 points on the previous period.
Key metrics
Open critical gaps
5-1
DSARs closed on time
88%+3
Consent withdrawals honoured within 7 days
96%+1
Personal data elements classified
2100
Highlights
- Consent artefact coverage extended to the kiosk channel across 22 districts.
- Rule 6 log retention verified at 400 days across all tier-1 systems.
- DSAR on-time completion improved to 91%.
Concerns
- Eight processor contracts still lack the prescribed security provisions.
- Children's data in the scholarship system remains without verifiable parental consent.
- The DPIA cadence has slipped past the twelve-month requirement.
2 pagesSubmitted to the department head and published to the oversight portal.
Why the concerns section matters
A monthly report that only lists progress trains the reader to stop reading it. The concerns section is what makes the report evidence: it establishes when leadership was told, in writing, that a specific obligation was not being met. That record protects the DPO and forces the decision to sit where it belongs.